This Post Contains
Spoilers from the Game of Thrones Season 5 Finale, Which I Wouldn’t Feel Bad
Ruining for Decent Human Beings, but Some of You Nerds Are So Damn Vengeful.
So there we
were, twenty million strong, all of us tuned in to the HBO feeds that we all
scrupulously pay for, because piracy is not a victimless crime and we know that
the Many Faced God does not look kindly on people who take what is not theirs.
We all tuned in to watch one of the last consensus entertainments in American
popular culture—and in the course of an hour we watched female children beaten
as part of a program of sadistic sexual exploitation, a Sand Snake whose only
role in the narrative of the season was to expose her breasts announce to a man
“you want a good girl, but you need the bad pussy,” and a woman forced to
confront her sexual crimes, beg forgiveness from an old white man, and then “atone”
for her sins through an act of ritual humiliation centered around her own
nudity and a habited prioress who announced her shame like a 19th
century town crier that would have made the inquisitors of Salem blush.
Many people
have, over the course of this fifth season, abandoned Game of Thrones because of its sexual politics. This is hardly
surprising. The show has demonstrated its willingness, over and over again, to
use rape and other forms of sexual violence not as narrative tools, but as emotional
bludgeons. There have been times where watching this show was like paying
attention to a hostage crisis. I have heard, from people I respect, the
argument that rape can be used to further narrative goals in valuable ways, and
that we should restrain judgment until all the facts are in. Well, the facts
are in. Game of Thrones has
demonstrated that it has no idea how to handle such subjects with anything
approaching insight. Women exist in the world of the show to be punished. I
mentioned earlier this week Hannibal Lecter’s argument that watching makes us
complicit, and Thrones made virtually
the same argument this week by positioning their own viewers as Meryn Trant,
the sadistic pedophile that Arya dispatched, for an hour this week, we all ostensibly
took our pleasure from watching women be hurt.
A quick
review of the placement of women in the culture of blockbuster entertainment
over the last several months has not been promising. From the controversy over
Black Widow’s role, and the extra-curricular comments of her male co-stars, in The Avengers: The Age of Ultron, to the
subtler disdain for Bryce Dallas Howard’s park executive in Jurassic World, women have not been well
served by this summer’s highest grossing fare. That’s not necessarily unusual.
Women are generally not well treated in most mass cultural entertainment and it
surrounding discourses (see Sarkeesian, Anita) , it has stood out more sharply
this summer. Part of the reason for that is that the summer began with
Imperator Furiosa, Charlize Theron’s character in the absolutely wonderful Mad Max: Fury Road (a film I am growing fonder of literally every day that passes). Fury Road did not perform narrative rocket science either. It
simply gave Theron, the film’s main character despite the title, something to do. She had agency, she took action. Nor
is Fury Road a narrative without
sexual violence. The violence against women in Immortan Joe’s compound is as
frightening and intense as anything that has been in Thrones, but the principle difference is that the women who were
subjected to violence were not made narratively passive by it. It is impossible
to imagine Furiosa, or one of the breeder wives that it is her mission to flee,
or one of the mothers that their convoy finds on the edge of the desert
speaking the line that Sansa Stark had in the finale, expressing her worry that
if Ramsay had his way “there would be nothing of [her] left.” The reason it is
impossible to imagine any of the women in Fury
Road speaking these lines, is that the film realizes that humanity is not
something that can be externally stripped away, it has to be given up. The Reek
storyline in Thrones, and the Sansa
storyline, and many, many others reveal the degree to which the show’s writers either
have not grasped this point, or are interested in testing the boundaries not of
their characters, but of their audience. Part of the result of that failure of
realization is the deployment of episodes like the season five finale—cudgels designed
to induce total emotional surrender. I’m kind of tired of surrendering.
Well I guess the Q then becomes, will you stop watching because the show is vile and reductive and makes you feel gross, or will you keep watching because being in the know and able to comment on it gives you a kind of cultural catchet?
ReplyDeleteAn interesting question, at the moment I am leaning towards "I'm out."
ReplyDeleteHey I love it - you can start on that project we have been talking about: reviewing each and every episode of Law and Order: SVU for the blog.
ReplyDelete