True Detective is that person you know who loves to
drop names. Look it’s McConaughey! Hey, there’s Harrelson! Robert W. Chambers!
Lovecraft! Cthulu!!!
It worked in
the first season of the show, in part because the Lovecraftian mythos that it
was tapping into has grown into an expanded universe taken up by a variety of
authors and used to tell new stories, and in part because people in general
were less familiar with the names being dropped. The average person would need
to spend at least a little time on Google to figure out what the in the world
was up with The King in Yellow. That
little bit of searching, investigating if you will, transformed the first
season of True Detective into a
singular experience. When all of that is combined with the spooky artistry that
Fukunaga loves so much, the show became an atmospheric dynamo.
Season two,
which premiered last night, however, doesn’t have the same things working in
its favor. In addition to the names of the cast (Vaughn, Kitsch, McAdams, and Farrell
are all highlighted and given character details in the opening episode), the
show tries to do the same brand of allusive name dropping that worked so well
in season one. Chinatown! The Maltese Falcon! James Ellroy! The
difference is that these names and features are so well known that the show
takes on a faint whiff of what I call Peggy Hill syndrome. Do you remember
Peggy Hill, the wife of Hank Hill on Fox’s animated masterpiece King of the Hill? Her character’s most defining
trait was a totally misplaced confidence in her own creativity, she would offer
up hackneyed clichés and tidbits of common knowledge as if they were germs of
original wisdom, “I’ve always said, a penny saved is a penny earned,” and that
kind of thing. You get the same vibe in this first episode of the second
season, the show is offered up as the brain child of a Nick Pizzolatto’s
singular creative voice, but it’s hard not to pay too much attention to the
stitching. Gone is the striking visual palate that made season one so
successful, Justin Lin—he of the Fast and
Furious franchise—brings nothing of his own distinctive kinetic style to
the first episode. Instead he seems to be trying to do a Fukunaga impression,
and instead ends up with something that comes off as the RC Cola to Roman
Polanski’s Coke.
Not even the
acting can come to the rescue here. Vaughn’s character calls for a deep sense
of stillness and menace, and Vaughn has all the stillness of a fish flopping in
the bottom of a boat. Farrell is trying his best, but the moment the script (in
true HBO fashion) attempts to elicit our empathy with his downfall with a story
about how his wife was brutally raped and he got into bed with organized crime
in order to find the man responsible, I immediately checked out. At this point
the use of sexual violence against women as a way for us to enter the interior
life of a white guy on HBO has practically become “Where’s Waldo?” it seems to
be hiding somewhere in every script. Rachel McAdams is given nothing to play
but daddy issues (her father, the head of a local hippy “institute” is played
by David Morse, and he is the best part of the opening hour). And we actually
watch Taylor Kitsch take some erectile dysfunction medication and wait in the
bathroom, impatiently checking his watch until it kicks in. That we are so
loaded up with back story in the opening episode betrays, to my mind, a little
insecurity on the part of Pizzolatto. A lot of people worked to make the first
season of True Detective what it was,
and now he is all that is left. That’s got to be a scary place to be. I liked
the original season, and I hope that season two can turn it around. But based
on what I have seen so far, I can’t blame anyone who might be concerned.
Actually that person I know who loves to drop names is you...
ReplyDeleteWhen you carry around as many as I do, you're bound to drop some.
ReplyDelete